Emerging markets Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Emerging markets - Essay Example Emerging markets are becoming the fastest drivers of global development. These markets are expected to grow twice or thrice the number of developed countries like the United States. The public investor continues to underweight these developing markets in their collections. Corporate profits seem to grow rapidly when there is a higher economic growth. One of the reasons why developed markets like the U.S have been ranked high is because of the development of markets outside the country. Some nations are borrowing a leaf from the U.S and are performing well as emerging markets. They include Brazil, Indonesia, Chile, Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Russia, Peru, and Korea. In this context, Turkey and Peru are the markets discussed, putting in mind that some of the factors that have contributed to their emergence are: The significance of trade, the role of the government, investments and savings, and education among others (Larrain, Helmut &Maltzan 67). Factors that have allowed Turkey to move up the development ladder Importance of investments and savings Historically, Turkey has been dependent on developed markets for a huge portion of its investments and savings. However, the country is now focusing to engage in more business with other regions of the world, with the Middle East, Asia, and Africa included. It is this shift in focus that is accelerating the growth and investment of Turkey. In addition to this, Turkey has in recent years overcome a sequence of economic and political challenges and is now benefiting from a period of solid and stable economic growth, which enables it to grow at least five percent yearly. Its world class characteristics include the strategic position at the crossroads of the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. To add on these strategic positions, the huge size of its domestic markets also attracts some investors, who remain confident about the country’s features. The goods market below shows relationship between the savings and in vestments of Turkey at equilibrium. The role of the government, its policies and programs The structural transformation of Turkey was generated by political stability and economic reform. First, the newly implemented FDI frame law by the government marks the foremost instalment of this economic reform to alter the investment setting in the country and make it attract global investors. The FDI frame law ensured equal treatment to all investors regardless of the initial authorization request to move dividends freely, to be guarded against expropriation, to get access to real estate, and to hire emigrants. Turkey reduced corporate tax from approximately 33% to 20% for each company. The reason for doing these was to make Turkey one of the leading liberal nations worldwide in terms of the investment environment and for FDI framework. The consequence of this transformation have been promising and significant, since the country started to grow at a faster rate after 2001 and it now has the utmost industrial power as well as the one of the leading free-market economies. The economic programs were founded on a powerful macroeconomic policy framework. Some of the broad-ranging structural government reforms are a key renovation of the banking system. A liberal foreign investment government, a better investment atmosphere, and privatization are the major pillars of government reform. The economic programs joined with supervisory and regulatory reforms improved the Turkish economy’s toughness to shocks. Consequently, Turkey emerged from the international crisis to be among the globe’s fastest-growing economies (Aguiar, & Gopinath 23). Educational level The availability and access of highly learned personnel is a position-specific element that has made Turkey emerge economically. High educated person are highly required by businesses that invest in technological businesses and have assets in skills like the capabilities to develop intangible or differentiated products. The presence of elites in interaction with labour

Income Distribution Essay Example for Free

Income Distribution Essay The total wage of a private sector worker is of US$137, 9 dollars per month; as it is considered that in each family has other income, and the minimum income per family will be of 224 dollars per month. This wage allows family to buy 67% of the basic basket, it is to say a little more than half of all necessary articles, and a restriction of 33% in the consumption of basic articles exists. The dolarization did not mean a revaluation of the wage as the government raised, it rather constituted a cut of the income, since the prices of goods and services were internationalized, while the wages stay depressed, in relation to the life cost. The concentration of wealth and work in Ecuador is acute; 1. The 2 % belonging to the poorest receive 0,015% of the national entrance, and they gain 1270 times less than the wealthier 2% of the population. 2. The 20% belonging to the wealthier receive 58,7% of the national entrance. Poverty: The accumulation of wealth in the hands of the monopolistic groups has like counterpart the poverty and the extreme poverty for the majority of Ecuadorians. In Ecuador the poverty borders 80% of the population and from these, 20% are in extreme poverty. Poverty in Ecuador has a structural character and a massive incidence. It is structural because historically the economic conditions have been created, socially and politically to consign to a great number of the population of its participation in the production and wealth of the country. That is to say, in Ecuador the poverty is not a consequence of the lack of resources or natural wealth but to the form in which the Earth property and other resources have been, and in the relations of dependency with the central capitalist countries. From year 2002 the situation has been more difficult still, the inflation rate (91%), the percentage of the General Budget that the government destined for the payment of the external debt (51%) caused greater poverty. In 2003 the amount that the state will destine for the payment of the external debt, will be of 2. 200 million dollars. CONCLUSION The present essay has studied the historical evolution, present situation and perspective to medium term of the Ecuadorian external debt. We can make a synthesis of the most important aspects of the mentioned analysis, which will allow us to verify the validity of the question posed. The use of external resources with aims of current consumption, mainly on the part of the governmental sector, has been one of the main causes so that the productivity of the outer finance is limited. The loans produce little or no finance and it causes economic yield in the increase of current expenses, which has given rise to the countries finances consumption on the basis of the external saving, and the weight of the debt for the following years was loaded. On the other hand, the elevated rate of triggered internal inflation as of 1990, took place partly due to the funding of the originating resources of the outside by concept of external loans that, through the global budget of the state, entered circulating means. In addition, the high cost of the loans, by the majority including banking credits, in the last years has determined the rate of yield of the capital for the projects financed with external contribution, must be sufficiently high, so that it reaches a greater level than the cost of the external indebtedness. The increase of the imports, mainly as of 1990, has also been a factor affecting the trade balance; therefore it has been necessary to obtain free currencies to pay these external obligations. This growth of imports has been due to a great extent in dependency of the national manufacturing industry, of the capital assets and foreign raw materials. The country has been unable to obtain adequate levels of resource surplus, as a percentage of exports, given the prevailing conditions of export growth and was required to decrease the growth rate of its external debt over time. Even though credit from multilateral is the only source of financing available, it is clear that there is a lack of planning of investment projects. The United States eliminated government funds due to problems of political nature, principally due to the fact that the country has an income per capita of US $ 360 annual. The debt of the private sector has a determining incidence in the deterioration of the balance of payments, although it does not cause a financial load when one is originating currencies of exports, in order to cancel the service of this debt, in 1995 the service of the same one will represent approximately, 8. 5 % of exports of goods and services, whereas for 1998, that relation will raise 12%, level that we considered alarming if it is taken into account that this index, for service of the debt in the public sector, will be, of 20% in 1998. It is evident that the existing legislation in Ecuador, on the administration of the indebtedness, has been a very important factor in the decisions that have been adopted in matter of policy of external financing, although the cases have not been few in which the government has made decisions from economic order moving away of the effective legal procedures, reason why the control problem of the Ecuadorian outer debt is deduced, as a lack of exact fulfillment of the law. The policy of the external indebtedness, from the economic and legal point of view, has had faults as much in its application as in its fulfillment, cause of which the external resources entered the country to finance their way, they do not have an optimal use, specific and productive, and on the contrary they have meant at certain moment a serious limiting economic growth for the country. Therefore we can firmly say: that the external debt has had an impact In Ecuadors Economic development.

Nuclear Energy in France and Germany

Nuclear Energy in France and Germany Brach Hadean Nuclear Energy Germany vs. France Nuclear energy and its validity in today’s world is a topic that stirs much debate and everyone seems to have an opinion on the issue, but who is correct? When considering Europe, France and Germany are on complete opposite ends of the nuclear spectrum. Germany believes the complete shutdown of nuclear derived power is necessary for a safe and prosperous country. France, on the other hand, opt for a pro nuclear stance. I intend to compare and contrast both countries views regarding nuclear energy and hopefully reach an effective conclusion. Brief History-Then and Now Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, numerous atomic reactors are raised for producing power, utilizing diagrams amazingly like those made for the submarines. These outlines work well and produce economical, emanation free power with low mining and transportation impact. An atomic fueled future is envisioned by many people. In 1974, France chose to make an expansive push for atomic vitality, and wound up with 75 percent of their power from atomic reactors. The US fabricated 104 reactors, and obtained 20 percent of its power from them. In time, work deficiencies and development postponements began driving the expense of atomic reactors up, decelerating their development. The 1979 Three Mile Island setback and the 1986 Chernobyl mishap further postponed the sending of atomic reactors. Choking regulations brought costs higher. 1986 testing demonstrate that advanced designs(other than the ones initially used to make submarines) might be extensively more secure. In 94, the Megatons to Megawatts settlement with Russia is marked to down-mix atomic warheads into reactor fuel. Inevitably, 10% of US power originates from disassembled atomic weapons. In the late 1990s and 2000s, the sensational well being record of the US reactor armada (0 casualties) and smooth operation of reactors consolidated with continuous stresses of worldwide environmental change because of carbon emanations realizes generous talk of an atomic renaissance, where new developments may begin once more. Then, solid enthusiasm toward Asia reinforces and yearning arrangements to fabricate vast armadas are made to fulfill developing vitality needs without including more fossil fuel. On March, 2011, a vast seismic tremor and wave immerse the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi. Reinforcement diesel generators come up short and the fuel rods cant be cooled. Fuel dissolves, hydrogen develops and explodes. Radiation is discharged, yet much of it goes out to the ocean rather than into populated zones. No individuals anticipated deaths from the radiation dosage. Nuclear power is at the end of the day considered a popular option, despite the dismissal it was met with in the 1970s. This is on the grounds that its presently being touted as an environmentally advantageous solution since it transmits far less greenhouse gasses during power generation than coal or other conventional plants. It is generally acknowledged as somewhat perilous, conceivably dangerous, yet reasonable way of creating power. Radiation isnt easily managed, particularly in atomic waste and upkeep materials, and large capital are required to hold, control, and shield both individuals and nature from its mischief. FRANCE Frances decision to launch a large nuclear program dates back to 1973 and the events in the Middle East that they refer to as the oil shock. The quadrupling of the price of oil by OPEC nations was indeed a shock for France because at that time most of its electricity came from oil burning plants. France had and still has very few natural energy resources. It has no oil, no gas and her coal resources are very poor and virtually exhausted. Frances choice to dispatch an extensive atomic system goes once again to the 1970s and the events in the Middle East that they allude to as the oil shock. The quadrupling of the cost of oil by OPEC countries was undoubtedly a stun for France in light of the fact that around that time a large portion of its power hailed from oil burning factories. France had and still has very few assets. It has no oil, no gas and its coal assets are exceptionally poor and essentially depleted. Policy makers saw one route for France to accomplish its energy independence: atomic energy, a wellspring of energy so effective that a couple of pounds of fissionable uranium is all the fuel required to run a huge city for a year. Arrangements were made to present the most exhaustive national atomic energy program ever. Throughout the following 15 years France introduced 56 atomic reactors, fulfilling its energy needs and actually sending out power to other European nations. As mentioned earlier, there were a few challenges in the early 70s, however from that point forward the atomic system has been famous and amazingly non disputable. A piece of their popularity comes from the way that researchers and scientists have a much higher status in France than in America. A lot of high positioned civil servants and government authorities studied science and engineering (instead of lawyers, as in the United States). French officials have worked to get individuals to learn the benefits of atomic energy and additionally the dangers. Lustrous TV campaigns fortify the connection between nuclear power and the power that makes advanced life conceivable. plant technicians request individuals take tours, an offer that six million French individuals have completed. Today, atomic energy is a commonplace thing in France. Conversely. The Fukushima disaster led many countries to rethink their view on nuclear energy. Germany plans to abandon it altogether, but French President Francois Hollande also wants to cut nuclear output sharply by a third in 20 years. Its a big ask in a country that now relies on nuclear for 75% of its electricity. If fully implemented, the pledge would force the closure of up to 20 of the countrys 58 reactors according to Professor Laurence Tubiana a former government adviser who the president asked to facilitate a national debate, paving the way for what they call la transition energetique. This would be a huge step, but Tubiana describes it as a logical evolution. France realized that Japan had survived economically when all its atomic power stations were shut down because of its diverse energy mix. In Japan, before the disaster, nuclear power delivered about 30% of the countrys electricity, but France is hugely dependent not only on nuclear, but on a single generation of nuclear power stations.† -BBC News Magazine Nuclear Power in France France derives over 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy. This is due to a long-standing policy based on energy security. France is the worlds largest net exporter of electricity due to its very low cost of generation, and gains over EUR 3 billion per year from this. France has been very active in developing nuclear technology. Reactors and fuel products and services are a major export. It is building its first Generation III reactor. About 17% of Frances electricity is from recycled nuclear fuel. Germany Germanys choice to kill the utilization of nuclear energy has been connected with the Fukushima disaster, to the point where it is frequently been viewed as sudden and hasty. Be that as it may, Germany has been debating the utilization of atomic energy for quite some time and its recent choice is just a step, but a huge one, on a long road. Subsequently, to completely comprehend the nations recent choice, it is important to grasp the historical backdrop of Germanys atomic energy program and the powerful debate that existed inside the nation throughout the decades paving the way to this choice. Germanys nuclear program started in the late 1950s, and the first plants opened in the 1960s. Whats more just a couple of years after the opening of the first commercial atomic power plant, the opposition to atomic developments made its appearance through protests. The primary episode of note happened in the 1970s, when neighborhood gatherings figured out how to stem the development of a plant in Whyl through civil rebellion. There were numerous critics of the utilization of force by the local authority against the dissenters, bringing significantly more consideration regarding the problem at hand. The impending choice to drop the development of the plant served as a jump start for the formation of anti-atomic gatherings in Germany. Then again, over the accompanying years not all developments were as fruitful. Germanys biggest protest to nuclear energy, which occurred in 1981 united many demonstrators to protest against the development of a nuclear plant in Brokdorf. The plant was built and is still in operation. It is planned to stay in operation for a long time to come. Around 1975 and 1987 there were a couple of small mishaps in the German plants. Some of these mishaps contaminated nearby areas, radiation discharge, open flames and harm to plants. Furthermore, while numerous individuals were, at that point, worried about the safety of atomic energy plants even before these mishaps, dread of nuclear energy was seriously increased by the Chernobyl plant explosion in 1986. The mishap had a substantial effect on Germany, defiling numerous zones with radiation, debilitating the populaces prosperity and additionally the wellbeing of water and nourishment supplies. These impacts gave new strength to hostile anti-atomic groups in Germany and around the globe. None the less, vast scale catastrophes(Chernobyl) were not Germanys sole concern. Atomic waste had previously been a worry beginning in the 1950s. In 1977, a proposition had been made to utilize salt mines in the city of Gorleben as a hold for atomic waste, yet arguments broke out and the arrangement was surrendered. But, the area is as of now being utilized as interval stockpiling and there are continuous rallys when waste is brought to the area. Numerous people contended that the expense and the danger connected with waste were reason enough to not put resources into atomic energy in Germany, yet the nation still kept utilizing its atomic energy plants. By 2002, 19 atomic energy plants were in operation in Germany, while the nation stayed reliant on transitory waste stockpiling locales and dispatched atomic material to Britain and France. By 2005, Germany quit delivery abroad yet at the same time had only temporary stockpiling sites With the opposition to atomic development exhibiting a solid resistance, Germanys atomic energy system wavered for many years. Two reactors were erected in 1991, but failed to stay open squandering colossal amounts of cash. The thought of moving from atomic energy had been authoritatively exhibited in 1980 by a German Commission. The Green party, which contradicted the utilization of atomic energy from the onset, popped up around the same time and immediately picked up space inside German governmental issues. The gathering first won seats in the commission in 1983 and, in 1998, with the Schrà ¶der organization, it was advertised that Germany would move away from atomic energy and capital would be funneled towards renewable energy. After the tragedy in Japan, Germany under the helm of Chancellor Merkel made an abrupt change in policy and implemented a complete phaseout away from nuclear energy in 2011 speeding up Schrà ¶ders policy in 2000. But, while the German public can hardly be accused of panicking, Chancellor Merkel certainly did. Had she merely continued the previous nuclear phaseout and decided to maintain patience, the effects might not have been so detrimental. Nuclear Power in Germany Germany until March 2011 obtained one quarter of its electricity from nuclear energy, using 17 reactors. The figure is now about 18%. A coalition government formed after the 1998 federal elections had the phasing out of nuclear energy as a feature of its policy. With a new government in 2009, the phase-out was canceled, but then reintroduced in 2011, with eight reactors shut down immediately. The cost of attempting to replace nuclear power with renewables is estimated by the government to amount to some EUR 1 trillion without any assurance of a reliable outcome, and with increasing reliance on coal. Public opinion in Germany remains ambivalent and at present does not support building new nuclear plants. More than half of Germany’s electricity was generated from coal in the first half of 2013, compared with 43% in 2010. Germany has some of the lowest wholesale electricity prices in Europe and some of the highest retail prices, due to its energy policies. German nuclear power units Plant Type MWe (net) Commercial operation Operator Provisionally scheduled shut-down 2001 2010 agreed shut-down March 2011 shutdown May 2011 closure plan Biblis A PWR 1167 2/1975 RWE 2008 2016 shutdown Neckarwestheim 1 PWR 785 12/1976 EnBW 2009 2017 shutdown Brunsbà ¼ttel BWR 771 2/1977 Vattenfall 2009 2018 shutdown Biblis B PWR 1240 1/1977 RWE 2011 2018 shutdown Isar 1 BWR 878 3/1979 E.ON 2011 2019 shutdown Unterweser PWR 1345 9/1979 E.ON 2012 2020 shutdown Phillipsburg 1 BWR 890 3/1980 EnBW 2012 2026 shutdown Kruemmel BWR 1260 3/1984 Vattenfall 2016 2030 shutdown Total shut down (8) 8336 Grafenrheinfeld PWR 1275 6/1982 E.ON 2014 2028 end 2015 Gundremmingen B BWR 1284 4/1984 RWE 2016 2030 2017 Gundremmingen C BWR 1288 1/1985 RWE 2016 2030 2021 Grohnde PWR 1360 2/1985 E.ON 2017 2031 2021 Phillipsburg 2 PWR 1392 4/1985 EnBW 2018 2032 2019 Brokdorf PWR 1370 12/1986 E.ON 2019 2033 2021 Isar 2 PWR 1400 4/1988 E.ON 2020 2034 2022 Emsland PWR 1329 6/1988 RWE 2021 2035 2022 Neckarwestheim 2 PWR 1305 4/1989 EnBW 2022 2036 2022 Total operating (9) 12,003 Total (17) 20,339 MWe Conclusion â€Å"Politics is the art of the possible, said Bismarck, the first German Chancellor. His present-day successor, Angela Merkel, knows perfectly well that her decision to phase out all nuclear power stations by 2022 makes no scientific or economic sense. In fact, she said so herself as recently as two months ago, when she promised that Germany would not let itself be rushed into abandoning nuclear power by the Fukushima accident in Japan.†- the telegraph This quote says it all..I believe Germany panicked into phasing out all nuclear energy by 2022. Too many German citizens protested against a nuclear future following the Fukushima explosion relying on emotions from the past and allowed it to cloud their judgment. Relying solely on renewable energy is a bad idea in my opinion. Studies have suggested that it will be extremely detrimental to the environment with the current technologies. France, on the other hand, is headed in the right direction but seems shortsighted and naive about the future. France, Germany and other countries should be looking at alternative nuclear reactors such as: the Integral Fast Reactor. The Integral Fast Reactor is a plant that has been in the staging phase for a considerable length of time. In any case it has yet to be assembled, stating that it requires large amounts of capital. While it is expensive, this fourth era atomic plant would be far more secure than what we have now, and would be powered totally from the waste of current atomic plants. Fast Reactors would burn 99% of their fuel and create minimal harmful waste. Our current renewable energy plan is not viable considering it would require the further degradation of the atmosphere by way of coal burning to implement it. Also, it will cost much more to maintain than the Fast Reactors would. Sources Pandoras Promise, 2013 documentary by: Robert Stone http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUdhHEtIsRw http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25674581 http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/country-profiles/countries-g-n/germany/ http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Country-Profiles/Countries-A-F/France/ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-16/germany-abandons-nuclear-power-and-lives-to-talk-about-it.html http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-11-14/2014-outlook-germanys-green-energy-switch http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8546608/Why-Germany-said-no-to-nuclear-power.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13597303 http://video.ft.com/960910465001/Post-Fukushima-Germany-dumps-nuclear/World http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2006/04/nuclear-power/did-you-know-learn

The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson

â€Å"The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson†, arguably the most famous captivity tale of the American Indian-English genre, is considered a common illustration of the thematic style and purpose of the English captivity narrative. As â€Å"the captivity genre leant itself to nationalist agendas† (Snader 66), Rowlandson’s narrative seems to echo other captivity narratives in its bias in favor of English colonial power. Rowlandson’s tale is easy propaganda; her depiction of Native American brutality and violence in the mid-1600s is eloquent and moving, and her writing is infused with rich imagery and apt testimony that defines her religious interpretation of the thirteen-week captivity. Yet can a more comprehensive understanding of Rowlandson’s relationship to Indians exist in a closer reading of her narrative? As â€Å"captivity materials . . . are notorious for blending the real and the highly fictive† (Namias 23), can we infer the real colonial relationships of this captivity in applying a modern understanding of economic, political and cultural transformations of American Indians? Mary Rowlandson was captive under King Phillips’s wife’s sister, and varying other Algonquian masters from February 20, 1676 through May 2, 1676. She recorded her narrative â€Å"as the war was slipping away from the Indians† (Calloway 93) and published it with popular acclaim. In the context of this tumultuous time, â€Å"it would be a grave mistake to ignore the clear indications that this narrative was intended primarily as a record of the author’s spiritual practices and to assume a specific existential and moral stance in the world† (Ebersole 20). Rowlandson’s intentions for the narrative no doubt â€Å"served religious and political aim... ...ivity. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia, 1995. Richter, Daniel K. Facing East from Indian Country: A Naà ¯ve History of Early America. Cambridge Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard, 2001. Namias, June. White Captives: Gender and Ethnicity on the American Frontier. Chapel Hill & London: University of North Carolina, 1993. Rowlandson, Mary. â€Å"The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson.† The Norton Anthology of American Literature. 6 th ed., Nine Baym, General Editor. New York, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2003. Snader, Joe. Caught Between Worlds: British Captivity Narratives in Fact and Fiction. Lexington , KY: University of Kentucky, 2000. Vaughan, Alden T., Clark, Edward W. Puritans Among the Indians: Accounts of Captivity and Redemption. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London England: Belknap, Harvard, 1981.

God’s World Essay

The â€Å"Zaabalawi† was written by Naguib Mahfouz (1911-2006) and published on 1963 in the collection of stories, God’s World (Dunya Allah). The central character is afflicted with a disease that no doctors or any other human being can cure. Written in the first person, the narrator remembered during his childhood a folktale saying that there is an extraordinary person named â€Å"Zaabalawi† who can cure any illnesses and diseases. This person possesses healing powers of such magnitude that affliction such as what the narrator has will surely be healed. The protagonist started to half-heartedly look for Zaabalawi, visiting and meeting diverse characters during his quest. He met a lawyer, a bookseller, a government officer, a calligrapher, a musician and a drunkard – all of these persons have somehow met or known Zaabalawi. The first person that the narrator met was Sheikh Quamar, who is a prominent lawyer in Cairo, Egypt. Quamar offered little help with the quest because it seems a long time ago since he last had contact with Zaabalawi. In this instance, it seems that the author Mahfouz is signifying that this person has forgotten Zaabalawi (his spirituality) due to his materialistic needs and successes in life. This type of person can be found all over the world; the person who puts material things and worldly desires primary in his life. Politicians may be inadvertently touched by this characterization. The second person that the narrator met was the District Officer. The officer informed the narrator that he hasn’t seen Zaabalawi for such a long time now for being so busy with his myriad functions and being preoccupied with worldy cares. He felt joy before during his youthful days when he was Zaabalawi and yet has slowly forgotten those days as he became more embroiled with what the world and the government responsibilities offer him. He drew the narrator a map with a fee so that he will be guided in his quest for Zaabalawi. He then guided the narrator inside the calligrapher’s house, Hassanein. This person personified those of us who had already experienced happiness in living a much more simpler life. However, this was only from a brief period in his life for now, he had experienced what it feels like to have power and to be relied upon by thousands of people. Power, indeed, is heady and can ruin one’s self. Hassanein is faithful to Zaabalawi’s memory. His behavior and style of living mirrors his spirituality and servitude toward Allah. He said that in everything that he does, he felt the presence of Zaabalawi. He encouraged the narrator with his sayings that he believed that the narrator will be healed by Zaabalawi. Hassanein also described Zaabalawi’s nature as elusive such that he may be in the vicinity any moment or might not appear in a person’s lifetime. Hassanein symbolizes the faithful followers of God. He has chosen to live life in a simpler term and welcome people in all walks of life without prejudice and bias. He believes in God and is shown through his works. The narrator is then directed towards the house of a famous musician, Sheikh Gad, who looks very serene and is a meditative man. He told the narrator that the suffering and pains that he is experiencing now is a necessary ingredient for him to finally strengthen his faith, and not only his body and mind. Gad believes that the meeting that took place between him and the narrator is in fact, Zaabalawi’s work (God’s effort). Zaabalawi is an inspiration and a motivation for the musician. Later on, the narrator found himself drinking wine at the Negma bar with Hagg wanas, a drunkard who was also acquainted with Zaabalawi. As he continued drinking, his mental and rational faculties were mystically stripped away one by one. With the first drink, the narrator â€Å"ignited his stomach†. The second drink, â€Å"loses his willpower†. The third, â€Å"loses his memory†, the fourth, â€Å"loses sense of future (time and direction), and at the fifth drink, the world revolved, the narrator forgot his quest and instead sees â€Å"colored planes† and found himself in a euphoric stage.

Communication and Professional Relationships Essay

1.1Explain the principles of effective communication? Why are 1.2effective communication skills important when developing 2.1positive relationships with children, young people and adults? 2.3 1.3What social, professional and cultural differences/factors may 2.2affect the way we develop relationships with children, young 2.3people and adults? 2.4 2.5Explain how to manage disagreements with children and young people within your school? 3.2Why is it important to reassure children, young people and adults about confidentiality. Provide an example of how confidentiality would be breached. Effective communication is a two-way process of giving and receiving information. Effective communication skills are important when developing positive relationships with children, young people and adult. Effective communication is important to develop a good rapport. You need to support children and young people in making choices. There are many forms of communication; there is verbal, non-verbal, written format and body language. You need to consider the forms of communication for the appropriate age and language. If you were communicating with little children you need to position your body to their level, you need to come face to face with them instead of looking down at them. With people of different abilities you tend to use hand gestures and rely on body language. While speaking to other staff members in the school you speak to them in a more formal way. It is important to know the cultural beliefs of everyone in the community as some cultures can cause communication barriers. As a Muslim in the school it would be hard to use eye contact as it is against their beliefs. You need to be able to create an atmosphere in which everyone feels involved and confident to communicate. You need to adapt communication for different needs. Other communication barriers that could occur are having misunderstandings, disagreements and lack of time. If a disagreement was to arise in the school I would stay calm. I would be assertive and discuss the issue in private. I would get the people involved in the disagreement together and talk through the problem. If talking calmly didn’t sort the problem out then the next step would be to ask someone else to step in who isn’t bias and see what they could suggest. If these steps didn’t work you would have to work your way up the ranks until you reach the head teacher who would then have to inform the governors. This is a problem for the two parties involved as formal steps would be taken and a tribunal would be carried out. You need to record all progress made within the school, including any difficulties you find children or employees are having as well as achievements that are made. Adults are role models for all young people so it is important to be a caring person, you need to be approachable, genuine and a good time keeper.